Post-Darganfod Controversy
By Matthew Kent
Screenshot of the deleted comment made by Ash Delphini (provided by Darkwhisper)
A comment recently appeared on an article produced by Falcifer’s Watch by someone called Ash Delphini [1]. In the comment made, Ash echoes the findings of Darganfod and an audio recording of myself and Theodore discussing the Darganfod investigation.
Ash apparently took issue with Falcifer’s Watch referring to themselves as members of the Order of Nine Angles and referred back to the Nine Neighbours investigation in which they discovered with substantial evidence to support, that one of the prerequisites for being a member of the ONA (not O9A) is to have been born in, or reside in, Britain. House of Iconoclast’s Theo Hiraeth responded to the comment, agreeing with Ash on that specific point but mentioned something more important.
“As far as I can see, Sirius and his nexion are slowly repairing the damage Sutter did to his and Chloe’s creation (O9A). Interzone Analysis was attempting to do the same before he vanished, so Sirius is essentially the face Omega Nine Alpha now; and if something can be salvaged from the mess that O9A culminated in, why not support the salvage efforts of “niners” like Sirius and his cadre?”
Falcifer’s Watch may not be part of the Order of Nine Angles by default of their geographical location and place of birth, but they produce quality articles of a “sinister” nature that are gradually improving the state of Omega Nine Alpha (O9A). Sirius Al-Ghul and his nexion are proof that the O9A isn’t just a cesspit of pedophiles and federal informants, and may actually have a chance of producing something with integrity and nobility.
Notes:
{1} The comment made by Ash Delphini was deleted by the owner of the Falcifer’s Watch Substack (Sirius Al-Ghul/Cameron Wilder) a few hours after being posted, along with replies to the comment — including Theo’s, but someone by the name of “Darkwhisper” captured the original comment made by Ash and the last reply to a response T.C. Downey gave, and emailed us with the screenshots. T.C. Downey asked why Ash believed that CB took the AL title in 2000 when ONA returned to the dark in 1998 (qv. Terfyniad) and someone else by the name of “Reginald Karp” responded with this.
Note: “Alice” was clearly meant to be “Ash.”
Due to our policy of transparency that was established with the Dark Crier we have presented the screenshots without editing anything out. We ask that our readers do not take Reginald’s assertions at face value because we have no idea why Cameron deleted Ash and Reginald’s comments. It’s easy and logical to think that he did this for the reason listed by Reginald. However, Ash was privately messaged later to see if she had deleted her own comment and she swore that she hadn’t, but it might just be that Falcifer’s Watch didn’t want conversations distracting readers from the article (which is understandable) and not because Cameron was trying to cover up the allegations made by Ash and Reginald because he couldn’t dispute them. And it might even be that he was worried about getting banned for Reginald’s statements about nazi organisations and the old guard. Anything is possible so as always use your own logic to figure out the reason behind why the comments were deleted.
Unless your comments are in violation of Substack's ToS we WILL NOT be deleting them.
Though I personally request that your comments be relegated to thoughtful criticisms for the preservation of our desire towards professionalism, I understand that debate sometimes requires an artistic flair to really drive home the rhetorical effect.
So with all that said, please carry on.
This seems like a foolish argument based on the fact the there are no "members" nor "leaders" nor "rules", for that matter. I refer to myself as "Order of Nine Angles" frequently, because that is philosophy I have adopted, as well as the path I have trod. I did not receive membership from a handler. I simply looked at my life with as much brutal self disclosure as I could then went out accomplished the goals I set as per my interpretation of the MSs. This is what makes me Order of Nine Angles and I owe no further explanation than that. What we "are" is held in others eyes, more than what we think of ourselves. However, I don't really care who calls themselves anything, as someone else's opinion of themselves has absolutely nothing to do with me or my existence. If we all were to say, meet at an ONAicon being held at the Civic Center in San Diego, you can be sure many duels would be held over who says they are this or that. Until that glorious convention day, our meetings are held here, in cyberspace. If all of you lived in the contiguous United States, I would welcome these online debates as we could end them with good roe in person to settle this up. As it stands, he who is wittiest is the victor. This typically means whoever is the greatest smartass wins. That is a prize I do not seek for myself in any way.