The quiet truth most people dodge. Systems don’t endure because they’re imposed once; they endure because they’re rehearsed daily, bodily, behaviorally. Even refusal, when it becomes habitual and theatrical, can stabilize the thing it claims to reject.
The Insidious Way teaches us that most aren't willing to hold themselves accountable by default, and thus this is the first step into descending into the Dark Pool.
To call oneself a host is to evade authorship. No architecture survives without consent enacted through repetition. The Sinister path is not an exorcism of hidden masters but the deliberate assumption of form, consequence, and becoming. What governs you does so because you have fed it with acts. Alignment begins where disavowal ends.
I agree with you. Though I see the attempted evasion still ending up right back where you started. It's better to face it from the start, however eventually all will face the reaper.
I am playing devil's advocate here because I genuinely think it's one of the most beautiful ways to dig deeper into truth.By uncovering hidden assumptions, by testing our reasoning, often we can find clearer or stronger angles. Much love 💕
That recursive entrapment idea nails something I've been trying to articulate for awhile now. The scripted rebellion concept is particulary sharp because I've watched peopl go through multiple 'lifestyle revolutions' only to end up with the same underlying patterns just dressed differently. The bit about using the Architect's tools to find the Architect's exit is kind of brutal but it tracks with how constrained even our 'alternatives' really are.
The quiet truth most people dodge. Systems don’t endure because they’re imposed once; they endure because they’re rehearsed daily, bodily, behaviorally. Even refusal, when it becomes habitual and theatrical, can stabilize the thing it claims to reject.
The Insidious Way teaches us that most aren't willing to hold themselves accountable by default, and thus this is the first step into descending into the Dark Pool.
To call oneself a host is to evade authorship. No architecture survives without consent enacted through repetition. The Sinister path is not an exorcism of hidden masters but the deliberate assumption of form, consequence, and becoming. What governs you does so because you have fed it with acts. Alignment begins where disavowal ends.
I agree with you. Though I see the attempted evasion still ending up right back where you started. It's better to face it from the start, however eventually all will face the reaper.
I am playing devil's advocate here because I genuinely think it's one of the most beautiful ways to dig deeper into truth.By uncovering hidden assumptions, by testing our reasoning, often we can find clearer or stronger angles. Much love 💕
Advocate away, steel sharpens steel.
That recursive entrapment idea nails something I've been trying to articulate for awhile now. The scripted rebellion concept is particulary sharp because I've watched peopl go through multiple 'lifestyle revolutions' only to end up with the same underlying patterns just dressed differently. The bit about using the Architect's tools to find the Architect's exit is kind of brutal but it tracks with how constrained even our 'alternatives' really are.